In Slavery's Wake | Premesh Lalu and Candice Jansen: Slavery, Technology, Control | 27 May 2026

In Slavery's Wake | Premesh Lalu and Candice Jansen: Slavery, Technology, Control | 27 May 2026

🎙 Premesh Lalu and Candice Jansen 👥 1K 📅 July 28, 2026 ⏱ 49 min 👁 26 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

slaverytechnologycontrolapartheidcybernetics

Summary

In this talk, Premesh Lalu and Candice Jansen explore the enduring legacies of slavery and their entanglement with technology and systems of control. Lalu begins with an analysis of Francis Danby’s 1828 painting ‘The Opening of the Sixth Seal,’ which depicts the apocalyptic aftermath of slavery’s abolition. He argues that the painting reveals the anxieties of the metropole and the subsequent rise of scientific disciplines, such as psychophysics and cybernetics, that sought to manage populations and labor. He traces the evolution from thermodynamics to psychophysics to cybernetics, linking these to the development of apartheid as a system of communication and control. He introduces the concept of the ‘proletarianization of the senses’ and ‘proletarianization of knowledge’ to describe how race and sensory experience are reconfigured in modernity. Candice Jansen then presents a poetic response to a photograph by David Goldblatt, reflecting on the erasure of enslaved individuals and the ongoing violence of colonial histories. She emphasizes the importance of ’looking together’ as a method to uncover layered histories and to rebuild our senses in the face of catastrophe. The talk concludes with a discussion on how to undo the scripts of slavery and apartheid in the contemporary moment, including the rise of AI.

202 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talk offers a rich and thought-provoking argument that connects historical events to contemporary technological developments. Lalu’s analysis of Danby’s painting and its connection to the birth of communication technologies is original and compelling. He provides a nuanced understanding of apartheid as not merely a legal system but as a technological apparatus of control. The concept of ‘proletarianization of the senses’ is a valuable contribution to critical theory. Jansen’s poetic intervention adds an affective dimension, grounding the theoretical discussion in personal and collective memory. However, the argumentation is dense and sometimes speculative, with leaps that may not be fully substantiated. The reliance on a few key sources (e.g., Erica Fretwell, Friedrich Hayek) could be expanded. Overall, the value lies in its interdisciplinary approach and its ability to provoke new ways of thinking about slavery, technology, and control.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The speakers demonstrate scholarly rigor by referencing specific historical events, artworks, and academic works. Lalu cites Francis Danby, the Cambridge Philosophical Breakfast Club, Norbert Wiener, and others, grounding his argument in historical and theoretical frameworks. Jansen references David Goldblatt and Zanab Gersho, adding a visual and poetic perspective. However, the talk is not a formal academic presentation with citations, and some claims are presented without direct evidence. The title accurately reflects the content, focusing on the intersection of slavery, technology, and control. The talk is part of a workshop, so it is more exploratory than definitive.

248 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on the intersections of slavery, technology, and control as discussed by the two speakers.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The talk is grounded in historical research and scholarly references, but it is primarily an interpretive and argumentative presentation rather than a peer-reviewed study. The speakers are established academics, and the content is coherent, but some claims are speculative and not empirically verified.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • The Opening of the Sixth Seal (painting) — Referenced by Premesh Lalu as a central artwork for his argument.
  • Sacred Channels by Erich Hörl — Cited by Lalu to support the argument about the birth of modern communication.
  • Sensory Experiments by Erica Fretwell — Cited by Lalu as a footnote on psychophysics in the US.
  • The Sensory Order by Friedrich Hayek — Mentioned by Lalu in relation to the sensory order and neoliberalism.
  • David Goldblatt's photograph of Gaasfontein farm — Referenced by Candice Jansen in her poetic response.
  • Zanab Gersho's concept of 'looking together' — Referenced by Jansen as a methodological approach.

Concurring Sources

  • Sacred Channels by Erich Hörl — Supports the argument about the birth of modern communication in the 1830s.
  • Sensory Experiments by Erica Fretwell — Provides parallel evidence of psychophysics in the US.

Dissenting Sources

  • None explicitly mentioned — No discordant sources were cited in the talk.

Contribution & Novelties

The talk offers a novel interdisciplinary framework linking the history of slavery to the development of communication technologies and systems of control. Lalu’s concept of ‘proletarianization of the senses’ extends Marxist analysis to sensory experience, while his reading of apartheid as a cybernetic system provides a fresh perspective. Jansen’s poetic intervention adds an affective and visual dimension, emphasizing the importance of ’looking together’ as a method to uncover layered histories.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Cybernetics — Foundational concept for understanding control and communication systems.
  • Psychophysics — Historical discipline linking physics to sensory perception.
  • Francis Danby — Artist of the discussed painting.
  • Apartheid — Historical system of racial segregation in South Africa.
  • David Goldblatt — Photographer whose work is central to Jansen’s response.

123 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity and quality of information, reflecting the dense and interdisciplinary content. The technical level is moderate, indicating that the talk is accessible to a general academic audience but requires some background knowledge. The overall reliability is good, though the speculative nature of some arguments prevents a higher score.

Reliability 7/10