Deepfakes, IA y delitos informáticos: Nuevas amenazas a la veracidad digital

Deepfakes, IA y delitos informáticos: Nuevas amenazas a la veracidad digital

🎙 Dra. Heidy Piedad Hernández Iñigo 👥 2K 📅 September 29, 2025 ⏱ 41 min 👁 134 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-16
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

digital forensicsdeepfakescybercrimechain of custodywrite blocker

Summary

The video is a seminar presentation by Dr. Heidy Piedad Hernández Iñigo, organized by the Peruvian Institute of Artificial Intelligence, focusing on digital forensics in the context of deepfakes, AI, and cybercrimes. The speaker introduces the importance of digital forensics in investigating cybercrimes, explaining the process step-by-step: identification, preservation, analysis, documentation, and presentation in court. She emphasizes the critical role of maintaining evidence integrity and chain of custody, referencing legal frameworks like the Mexican National Code of Criminal Procedures and the EU’s GDPR. The presentation covers various forensic tools such as write blockers, EnCase, FTK, Autopsy, Wireshark, and Volatility, and illustrates their use through real-world cases like the Pemex ransomware attack and a cyberstalking case. The speaker also explains fundamental concepts like bits, IP addresses, VPNs, and malware. However, the title’s focus on deepfakes and AI is only superficially addressed, with the majority of content dedicated to general digital forensics. The talk is introductory and aimed at a broad audience, lacking technical depth on AI-specific challenges.

166 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value of the information lies in providing a clear, accessible introduction to digital forensics, covering essential procedures and tools. The speaker effectively uses analogies and case studies to illustrate key points, making the content engaging for non-experts. However, the argumentation is largely descriptive rather than analytical, with limited critical evaluation of the methods or their limitations. The presentation would benefit from more concrete examples of deepfake detection and AI-specific forensic challenges, as the title suggests. The reliance on anecdotal cases, while illustrative, does not provide robust scientific evidence for the effectiveness of the described techniques.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The scientific rigor is moderate; the speaker references legal frameworks (Mexican Code, GDPR) and mentions tools used in practice, but does not cite specific academic studies or peer-reviewed sources. The quality of sources is acceptable for an introductory talk, but the lack of citations weakens the scientific credibility. The title is somewhat misleading as the content focuses more on general digital forensics than on deepfakes and AI specifically. The speaker’s expertise is evident, but the presentation would benefit from more precise terminology and up-to-date references on AI-related threats.

199 words

Title / Content Match

The title promises a focus on deepfakes, AI, and cybercrimes, but the content primarily covers general digital forensics, with only brief mentions of deepfakes and AI. The title is somewhat misleading.

Quality & Reliability

6/10

The presentation is an expert opinion by a forensic science doctoral candidate, providing a general overview of digital forensics, tools, and legal frameworks. It lacks depth on deepfakes and AI-specific threats, and includes some inaccuracies (e.g., 'G blocker' vs 'write blocker'). The content is largely introductory and relies on anecdotal examples rather than rigorous scientific evidence.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Código Nacional de Procedimientos Penales (Mexico) — Referenced for legal framework on evidence preservation and chain of custody.
  • General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) — Referenced for data protection requirements in the EU.

Concurring Sources

  • Digital Forensics: An Introduction — General agreement on the importance of forensic procedures.

Dissenting Sources

  • Deepfake detection: A survey — The video does not address specific deepfake detection techniques, which are complex and evolving.

Contribution & Novelties

The presentation provides a basic overview of digital forensics, emphasizing the importance of evidence integrity and chain of custody. It introduces common tools and techniques, but does not offer novel insights or advanced methodologies. The discussion of deepfakes and AI is superficial, lacking specific detection techniques or case studies.

Pour aller plus loin :

88 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows moderate scores across all dimensions, with slightly higher scores in quantity of information and reliability, but lower in technical level and quality. This indicates a balanced but introductory presentation, suitable for a general audience but lacking depth for experts.

Reliability 6/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.