Shared Power, Shared Futures: Global Practices for Societal Resilience

Shared Power, Shared Futures: Global Practices for Societal Resilience

🎙 Harvard Ash Center 👥 13K 📅 June 5, 2026 ⏱ 85 min 👁 150 📄 debate 🧭 2026-08-13
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

power sharingresiliencecollaborationdemocracycrisis

Summary

The webinar, hosted by Harvard’s Ash Center, explores how power-sharing arrangements contribute to societal resilience in times of crisis. Danielle Allen opens with lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing the need for collaboration across public, private, and civil society sectors. She introduces the RAECI framework (adding ’engaged’ to the traditional RACI chart) to operationalize power sharing. Panelists Adam Kahane, Fathali Moghaddam, and Valeriya Ionan then discuss their perspectives: Kahane argues that collaboration across deep differences is possible without agreement or trust, focusing on ‘power and love’ as complementary forces; Moghaddam presents ‘omniculturalism,’ a two-stage educational approach emphasizing human commonalities before differences; Ionan shares insights from Ukraine’s resilience amid conflict. The discussion highlights both the potential and limits of power sharing, with audience Q&A addressing practical applications. The webinar concludes that power sharing, while challenging, is essential for building trust and effective responses to complex crises.

145 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The webinar provides valuable insights into power sharing as a practical approach to societal resilience. Danielle Allen’s examples from the COVID-19 pandemic (vaccine distribution, school reopening) illustrate how power sharing can be operationalized through frameworks like RAECI. Adam Kahane’s argument that collaboration does not require agreement or trust is compelling, backed by decades of work in conflict zones. Fathali Moghaddam’s omniculturalism offers a novel educational framework, though its empirical basis is not detailed. The panelists engage constructively, highlighting complementarities and tensions. The argumentation is solid, though some claims would benefit from more concrete evidence or case studies.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The webinar demonstrates scientific rigor through the expertise of the speakers and their references to established frameworks (e.g., RACI, omniculturalism). However, no specific sources are cited during the discussion, and the description provides no links. The title accurately reflects the content, focusing on power sharing and societal resilience. The panelists’ credentials lend credibility, but the lack of explicit citations limits verifiability. The discussion is well-structured and balanced, with diverse perspectives.

182 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a webinar on power-sharing practices for societal resilience, with global examples and expert panel.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The webinar features established scholars and practitioners (Harvard professor, Reos Partners co-founder, Georgetown professor, former scientific director) discussing evidence-based frameworks (RACI/RAECI, omniculturalism, power and love). Claims are grounded in practical examples (COVID response, South Africa, Colombia) and academic work, but no formal citations or data are provided during the discussion.

Key Moments

Contribution & Novelties

The webinar contributes to the discourse on societal resilience by synthesizing diverse frameworks (power sharing, omniculturalism, power and love) and offering practical tools like the RAECI chart. It emphasizes the importance of engaging stakeholders beyond formal authorities, a nuanced perspective on power dynamics.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Power sharing (Wikipedia) — Overview of power-sharing arrangements in political science.
  • RACI matrix (Wikipedia) — Background on the RACI framework.
  • Omniculturalism (Fathali Moghaddam’s work) — Explanation of the concept.
  • Reos Partners — Adam Kahane’s organization, offering resources on transformative scenarios.

88 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity and quality of information, reflecting the depth of discussion and expertise. The technical level is moderate, making it accessible to a broad audience. Overall reliability is high due to the credibility of the panelists.

Reliability 8/10