Democratic Backsliding: Why Is It Happening? What Can Stop It?

Democratic Backsliding: Why Is It Happening? What Can Stop It?

🎙 Susan Stokes 👥 13K 📅 March 7, 2026 ⏱ 74 min 👁 393 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-13
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

democratic backslidingexecutive aggrandizementincome inequalitypolarizationdemocratic erosion

Summary

In this seminar, Professor Susan Stokes discusses the phenomenon of democratic backsliding, also termed democratic erosion, which has become the primary threat to democracies, surpassing coups. She defines it as a process of executive aggrandizement where elected leaders undermine independent institutions such as courts, the press, and election bodies. Stokes identifies two ideological variants: right-wing ethnonationalists and left-wing populists. She presents empirical evidence showing a global wave of erosion since the late 1990s. Drawing on cross-national statistical analysis, she finds that income inequality is a robust predictor of backsliding, more so than GDP per capita or the age of democracy. She explains that inequality fosters grievances and polarization, which leaders exploit to maintain support while attacking institutions. Stokes discusses strategies such as polarization and ’trash talking’ democracy to delegitimize checks and balances. She also addresses how erosion can be slowed or stopped, and concludes with implications for international relations and the risk of conflict in a more autocratic world.

159 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talk provides a comprehensive overview of democratic backsliding, synthesizing a large body of research. Stokes presents a clear conceptual framework and supports her claims with empirical evidence, including statistical correlations and illustrative examples from various countries. The argumentation is logically structured, moving from definition to causes to strategies and potential remedies. She acknowledges nuances, such as the distinction between normal executive overreach and genuine erosion, and the role of both left- and right-wing leaders. The discussion of income inequality as a key driver is compelling and backed by robust statistical analysis. The talk also offers practical insights into how backsliding can be countered, making it valuable for both scholars and practitioners.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

Stokes demonstrates high scientific rigor, referencing her own book and the work of other scholars, such as Meliss Leybens and Larry Bartels. She uses data from the Varieties of Democracy project and presents statistical findings transparently. The title accurately reflects the content, which addresses both the causes and potential solutions to democratic backsliding. The talk is well-sourced, though it does not provide a formal bibliography; however, the references are credible and relevant. The discussion is balanced, considering multiple perspectives and acknowledging uncertainties.

209 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which covers causes and potential remedies for democratic backsliding.

Quality & Reliability

9/10

The speaker is a distinguished professor of political science, director of a democracy research center, and president of the American Political Science Association. The talk is based on her book and draws on extensive empirical research, including cross-national statistical analysis and case studies. The argument is well-structured and supported by references to academic work.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Stokes, S. (2023). Democratic Backsliding: Why Leaders Undermine Their Own Democracies — The talk is based on her book, which she references throughout.
  • Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project — Used for expert coding and measures of democratic erosion.
  • Leybens, M. (work on democratic backsliding) — Mentioned for her conceptualization of backsliding as decline in vertical and horizontal accountability.
  • Bartels, L. (work on public opinion and democracy) — Referenced for evidence that support for democracy has not declined significantly.

Concurring Sources

Dissenting Sources

  • Some scholars argue that income inequality is not a primary driver of democratic backsliding — Alternative explanations focus on cultural factors, elite actions, or international influences.

Contribution & Novelties

The talk provides a comprehensive synthesis of current research on democratic backsliding, emphasizing the role of income inequality as a key structural driver. It offers a clear framework for understanding the phenomenon and discusses strategies for resistance. The speaker’s expertise and the breadth of examples make it a valuable resource for scholars and policymakers.

Pour aller plus loin :

117 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in information quantity, quality, and reliability, with a moderate technical level. This indicates a well-researched and credible presentation that is accessible to a broad audience while maintaining academic rigor.

Reliability 9/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.