Qwen 3.8… Encore une autre dinguerie ? Du grand n'importe quoi
Qwen 3.8… Another insane release? Complete nonsense
Title history
- Qwen 3.8… Encore une autre dinguerie ? Du grand n'importe quoi — observed on 20261101-0105 UTC (YouTube)
Keywords
Summary
179 words
Critical Evaluation
Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument
The video offers practical, real-world testing of Qwen 3.8 Max, which is valuable for potential users. The creator demonstrates actual outputs, providing visual evidence for each claim. However, the argumentation is heavily subjective, relying on personal aesthetic preferences and anecdotal comparisons rather than objective metrics. The absence of controlled benchmarks weakens the analysis, and the creator’s strong opinions sometimes overshadow factual observations. Still, the hands-on nature adds authenticity and helps viewers set expectations.
Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy
The video lacks scientific rigor: no cited benchmarks, no reproducible methodology, and the testing is informal. Sources are limited to the Qwen pricing page and the creator’s own previous videos, with no external references to official documentation or independent evaluations. The title is clickbait but accurately conveys the creator’s disappointment. No comment trends are available as no comments were provided.
148 words
Title / Content Match
The title accurately reflects the content as the creator tests the model and finds it underwhelming in several areas, matching the 'nonsense' sentiment.
Quality & Reliability
6/10
The video provides a hands-on test of Qwen 3.8 Max with practical examples, but the assessment is subjective and lacks rigorous methodology. Some claims are based on personal preference, and there are no external benchmarks cited. The creator's experience is valuable but not systematic.
Chapters
Cited Sources
- Qwen Token Plan Pricing — The creator subscribes to a token plan for Qwen 3.8 Max and discusses pricing details.
- Kimi K2.7 Code: the most powerful local AI today? — The creator references his previous video on Kimi K3, which he uses as a comparison benchmark.
External References
Contribution & Novelties
The video provides a firsthand, unstructured evaluation of Qwen 3.8 Max across multiple domains (code, games, images, research), filling a gap left by official release notes. It highlights specific weaknesses such as poor game physics and unsupported deep research, which are not typically covered in promotional materials. The comparison with Kimi K3 offers a practical reference point.
Pour aller plus loin :
- Qwen official website - Official model information and updates.
- LMArena - Community leaderboard for LLM benchmarks.
- Qwen on Wikipedia - Overview of the Qwen family of models.
89 words
Radar Profile
The scores show a moderate quantity of information but lower quality and reliability, reflecting the subjective nature of the review. Technical level is moderate, accessible to a general audience. The overall profile suggests a casual test rather than a rigorous scientific analysis.