« Moderne / Modernisme. Qu’est-ce que la modernité en art ? » - Anne Boissière

« Moderne / Modernisme. Qu’est-ce que la modernité en art ? » - Anne Boissière

Modern / Modernism. What is modernity in art? - Anne Boissière

🎙 Anne Boissière 👥 125 📅 November 12, 2019 ⏱ 32 min 👁 231 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-10-10
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

Adornomodernitéesthétiquemusiqueréification

Summary

Anne Boissière, philosopher at the University of Lille, delivers a conference paper titled ‘Taking care of regression’ as part of a colloquium on modernity and modernism in art. She explores Theodor Adorno’s contribution to understanding modernity, challenging simplistic progress/restoration dichotomies. Boissière argues that for Adorno, modernity is not aligned with progress but paradoxically with a certain form of regression, evident in his writings on music. She first analyzes the false couple of progress and restoration in ‘Philosophy of New Music’, where Adorno opposes Schoenberg and Stravinsky not as a simple value judgment but as a dialectical exploration. She then discusses Adorno’s critique of the avant-garde, particularly serialism and aleatory music, as forms of rationalization that repress subjectivity. Finally, she examines the theme of the mythic power of music through the episode of the sirens in ‘Dialectic of Enlightenment’, suggesting that modernity involves a magical element that rationalization attempts to dominate. Boissière emphasizes Adorno’s attention to regression, childhood, and the body as constitutive aspects of artistic experience, proposing a nuanced reading of his philosophy.

173 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The lecture provides a significant added value by clarifying Adorno’s complex position on modernity, often misread as a simple defense of atonal music. Boissière shows how Adorno’s critique of Stravinsky is not a mere dismissal but a philosophical analysis of the primitive in modernity. She also highlights Adorno’s ambivalence toward the avant-garde, linking his disagreement with serialism to his broader critique of instrumental reason. The argumentation is rigorous, carefully grounded in textual evidence (e.g., quotes from Mahler’s book and Berg’s), and demonstrates a deep understanding of the philosophical and musical context. While not entirely novel, it offers a refreshing interpretation that emphasizes the dialectical and non-dualistic aspects of Adorno’s thought.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The presentation is scientifically rigorous, consistently referencing Adorno’s works (Philosophy of New Music, Dialectic of Enlightenment, writings on Mahler and Berg) and contextualizing them historically (Darmstadt, Schoenberg’s circle). The sources are mainly Adorno’s texts and relevant secondary literature, though direct citations are not always fully referenced. The speaker’s expertise is evident, and the title accurately captures the content. The colloquium context is also scholarly (Labex Comod). No comments were provided for analysis.

197 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on the question of modernity in art through Adorno's philosophy, specifically his musical writings.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The lecture is a well-structured philosophical analysis by a university professor, grounded in Adorno's texts. It demonstrates deep knowledge and careful interpretation, though it is an interpretive essay rather than an empirical study. The sources are clearly referenced, and the argumentation is coherent.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Concurring Sources

Contribution & Novelties

This lecture offers an original synthesis of Adorno’s thought on modernity, emphasizing his paradoxical alliance with regression rather than progress. It corrects common misconceptions about his stance on Stravinsky and the avant-garde, showing the dialectical nature of his arguments. The interpretive framework highlights the importance of myth, childhood, and the body in Adorno’s aesthetics, opening avenues for further research.

Pour aller plus loin :

98 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quality of information and technicality, indicating a dense and scholarly presentation. Quantitative information is also high, but the fiability score is slightly lower due to the interpretative nature. Overall, the lecture is highly valuable for specialists.

Reliability 8/10