OpenAI la ha CAGADO

OpenAI la ha CAGADO

OpenAI has screwed it up

by Jon Hernández · View the channel on PSI

Humanities, Social Sciences & Thought AI — News & Applications UYComputer scienceUYQArtificial intelligence (AI)
🎙 Jon Hernández 👥 810K 📅 September 30, 2026 ⏱ 31 min 👁 2K 📄 news review 🧭 2026-09-30
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

OpenAIDotsSpacespricingGPT-6.1

Summary

This video is a critical review of OpenAI’s DevDay announcements. The host, Jon Hernández, expresses disappointment with what OpenAI presented, arguing that the new personal agents called ‘Dots’ are not innovative, being similar to existing tools like Grokbot from X and Meta’s Muse. He highlights that Dots are only available on expensive Pro accounts and are limited to certain regions, unlike competitors offering free or cheaper access. He also discusses the new ‘Spaces’ collaborative workspace, which he considers underdeveloped and lacking friction. A major point of criticism is OpenAI’s pricing changes: the $200 per month plan’s usage was halved, and a new $500 plan was introduced, effectively doubling the cost for heavy users. He mentions the new ‘Ultrafast’ mode which is 8x faster but not as revolutionary as promised. He also notes the surprise launch of GPT-6.1, which improves cost efficiency but not enough to compensate for the pricing cuts. The video includes a sponsor segment about a smart recorder. The overall tone is negative, with the host asserting that OpenAI has fallen behind competitors like Anthropic and Meta in terms of innovation and pricing strategy.

186 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides a valuable first-hand account of the OpenAI DevDay, including real interactions with the new Dots agent and a detailed walkthrough of the pricing changes. The argumentation is structured and persuasive, although heavily subjective. The host clearly justifies his criticisms with concrete examples: the lack of novelty compared to existing products, the restricted availability, and the perceived unfair pricing hikes. However, some claims, such as the exact impact of the new plans on existing users, are presented without external verification. The sponsor segment is clearly separated and does not unduly influence the analysis.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video is based on the DevDay presentation and the host’s own testing, which lends some authenticity. However, the lack of independent sources or references undermines the scientific rigor. The description includes links to guides and community resources, but these are not directly cited as evidence. The title accurately matches the content. The presence of a commercial sponsorship is noted; it appears as a distinct segment and does not affect the overall analysis, though it occupies about two minutes of the video. The host does not provide peer-reviewed sources, but for a news review, this is acceptable. The arguments rely primarily on the host’s expertise and personal experience, which is reasonable for this format.

224 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the video's critical stance on OpenAI's recent announcements.

Quality & Reliability

6/10

The information about OpenAI's announcements is based on the DevDay presentation and first-hand testing, but the analysis is heavily opinionated and lacks independent verification of some claims.

Chapters

Cited Sources

  • Club de la IA — Communauté en ligne pour les utilisateurs d'IA
  • Guía para usar ChatGPT como un PRO — Guide gratuit pour optimiser l'utilisation de ChatGPT
  • Guía NotebookLM — Guide pour NotebookLM
  • Guía imágenes con ChatGPT — Guide pour la génération d'images avec ChatGPT
  • Guía VibeCoding — Guide pour créer des logiciels sans savoir programmer
  • La hostIA que viene — Livre de Jon Hernández sur l'IA

External References

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a critical and personal take on OpenAI’s DevDay, highlighting aspects that may not be covered in more neutral news outlets, such as the practical implications of the new pricing structure and the performance of the Dots agent in real-world use. It provides a comparative view with competitors like Meta and Grok, which enriches the analysis. However, the novelty is limited as it mostly echoes common criticisms in the AI community. The video does bring to light the specific price hike and account changes, which are important for users.

Pour aller plus loin :

122 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows relatively balanced scores, with a slight emphasis on quantity of information over technical depth. The video provides a good amount of content but lacks rigorous sourcing and technical explanations, making it more of an opinion-based analysis rather than a purely factual report.

Reliability 5/10