Demand-Driven Context: What 300 Incidents Reveal About Tribal Knowledge - Raj Navakoti

Demand-Driven Context: What 300 Incidents Reveal About Tribal Knowledge - Raj Navakoti

🎙 Raj Navakoti 👥 230K 📅 October 13, 2026 ⏱ 37 min 👁 28 📄 original study 🧭 2026-10-13
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

tribal knowledgeincident triageAI agentknowledge basecontext engineering

Summary

The talk addresses the challenge of giving AI agents enough context to resolve incidents. Initial attempts with limited documentation and then with all documentation via RAG failed. The speaker introduces Demand-Driven Context (DDC), inspired by TDD, where agents identify missing knowledge gaps and request only necessary information. They ran an experiment on 300 incidents (clustered into 20 types) and observed convergence to 46 entities after nine cycles. The talk also discusses maintaining knowledge over time with a ‘propose knowledge’ skill to prevent knowledge rot. The methodology is presented as a way to surface tribal knowledge and make it finite.

99 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value lies in presenting a practical methodology to surface tribal knowledge and make it finite. The argument is supported by the experiment’s data: the number of new entities decreases per cycle, showing convergence. However, it’s a single case study and may not generalize. The reasoning is logical and builds on the failure of previous approaches.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The talk does not cite external sources, relying on the speaker’s experience and data. The description links to conference pages only. The title matches the content well. No comments provided, so no analysis of public reception.

107 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, as the talk details a study of 300 incidents to surface tribal knowledge and introduces the Demand-Driven Context methodology.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The talk presents a case study with specific data (46 entities, convergence after 9 cycles), but it is a single experiment, self-reported, and not peer-reviewed. The methodology is plausible but lacks independent validation.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • NDC Conferences — Main conference site mentioned in description
  • NDC Oslo — Specific conference site where the talk was recorded

Concurring Sources

Dissenting Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The talk contributes a novel methodology (Demand-Driven Context) that applies TDD principles to knowledge engineering for AI agents. It empirically demonstrates that knowledge required for incident resolution is finite and converges, offering a data-driven approach to curate context. The ‘propose knowledge’ skill also addresses knowledge maintenance.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Test-Driven Development — The inspiration for DDC; TDD emphasizes writing tests that fail before implementing code, similar to letting agents fail to identify knowledge gaps.
  • Retrieval-Augmented Generation — A technique used in the talk’s second attempt; combining retrieval with generation, but here it failed when given all documentation.
  • Knowledge Graph — A way to structure knowledge; the talk considered building a knowledge graph but found it unnecessary when using a curated entity list.

124 words

Radar Profile

The profile shows high scores in information quantity and moderate scores in reliability, reflecting a data-rich but self-reported case study. The balance suggests a talk that is informative and technically detailed but with limited external validation.

Reliability 7/10