Webinar – Role of a Regulatory Agency in Pre-Disposal Management: Interim Storage

Webinar – Role of a Regulatory Agency in Pre-Disposal Management: Interim Storage

🎙 Gel Manurv 👥 2K 📅 September 23, 2026 ⏱ 89 min 👁 124 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-10-15
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

pre-disposal managementinterim storageregulatory agencyradiation protectionnuclear waste

Summary

This webinar, part of the NEA Regulators Forum series, addresses the role of regulatory agencies in pre-disposal management of radioactive waste, with a focus on interim storage. The speaker, Gel Manurv of the Netherlands, outlines the necessity of interim storage as an intermediate step before geological disposal, given the complexity and long timelines of final disposal projects. He describes various storage types—pool storage, dry cask storage, and vault storage—each with specific regulatory foci such as containment, criticality, and structural integrity. He emphasizes that interim storage facilities are not the final step, requiring robust planning for retrievability and eventual transfer to disposal. The regulatory process is divided into four phases: pre-licensing, licensing, commissioning, and operation, each demanding different oversight approaches. Key regulatory tools include safety cases, waste acceptance criteria, aging management programs, periodic safety reviews, and inspections. The presentation also highlights challenges such as the uncertainty of operational lifetimes, aging management, and the need for waste acceptance criteria compatible with future disposal sites. An international framework, including IAEA and OECD NEA, supports knowledge exchange and regulatory dialogue. The Q&A session addresses questions on waste classification, potential incompatibilities between storage and disposal criteria, and the role of decommissioning in storage facility lifecycles.

200 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The webinar provides a valuable, authoritative overview of interim storage regulation, drawing on the speaker’s direct experience with the Dutch COVRA facility. The argumentation is logically structured, progressing from the rationale for interim storage to detailed regulatory tools and phases. It effectively balances theoretical principles with practical examples, such as the Dutch centralized approach and the use of passive cooling. The inclusion of a panel discussion and Q&A adds depth, addressing real-world challenges like the alignment of waste acceptance criteria between storage and disposal. The emphasis on long-term knowledge management and stakeholder communication is particularly insightful, highlighting a dimension often overlooked in technical discussions. While not presenting novel research, the synthesis of regulatory practices across countries offers practical value for both new and experienced regulators.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The webinar demonstrates strong scientific rigor, anchored in international standards and experiences. The speaker references IAEA guidance (e.g., GSG1 for waste classification) and mentions OECD NEA structures, lending credibility. The content is consistent with documented practices in the nuclear industry. The title accurately reflects the scope, which is specifically the regulatory role in interim storage—the title is neither misleading nor exaggerated. The presentation is well-organized, and the speaker clearly distinguishes between categories of waste and facility types. Although specific source URLs are not provided in the description, the provenance from a major intergovernmental agency ensures a high degree of reliability. The webinar also serves as a practical training tool for regulatory professionals, conforming to its stated purpose of facilitating intergenerational knowledge transfer.

262 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on the regulatory role in interim storage of radioactive waste.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The webinar is delivered by an experienced regulator and hosted by the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, ensuring high reliability. However, it remains an overview rather than a deep technical analysis, limiting depth.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • IAEA Safety Standards — Referenced for waste classification and safety guides such as GSG1.
  • OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) — Hosting organization and forum for regulatory exchange.

Concurring Sources

  • IAEA Safety Standards Series GSG-1 — Referenced for waste classification, consistent with the speaker's use of IAEA guidelines.

Contribution & Novelties

The webinar contributes by consolidating international regulatory practices for interim storage, offering a structured framework for regulators. It emphasizes the often-underappreciated challenge of long-term knowledge management and the dynamic nature of waste acceptance criteria. The presentation of the four regulatory phases and the associated tools provides a clear roadmap for regulatory oversight. Notably, it highlights the importance of planning for retrievability and compatibility with future disposal solutions from the outset.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • IAEA Radioactive Waste Management — Official overview of international standards and practices.
  • Dry cask storage on Wikipedia — Detailed description of a key interim storage technology.
  • OECD NEA Regulatory Skills Hub — The series this webinar belongs to, offering further resources.

116 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores across all dimensions, indicating a well-rounded and reliable presentation. The slightly lower 'qualite_information' relative to quantity and reliability suggests that while comprehensive, the depth per topic is limited by the webinar format.

Reliability 9/10