Que veut dire l'intégration au sein des Grands Projets ASLAN ? – Kristine Lund

Que veut dire l'intégration au sein des Grands Projets ASLAN ? – Kristine Lund

What does integration within the ASLAN Grand Projects mean? – Kristine Lund

🎙 Kristine Lund 👥 270 📅 October 20, 2026 ⏱ 25 min 👁 6 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-10-20
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

integrationinterdisciplinarityteamworktaskworkevaluation

Summary

Kristine Lund, director of LabEx ASLAN, presents a talk on the meaning of integration within interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary (ITD) research projects. She begins by describing the ASLAN large projects, which involve disciplines like language sciences, computer science, education, and occasionally geography, history, and ethology. She introduces the Science of Team Science field, which studies how ITD teams work, and distinguishes between ’teamwork’ (collaboration processes) and ’taskwork’ (scientific content work). Lund emphasizes that both require distinct knowledge, skills, and attitudes. She references the Integrate Expert career proposal and defines integration as combining data, methods, concepts, theories, or perspectives. Drawing on Julie Thompson Klein, she positions integration as the core of interdisciplinarity, and differentiates interdisciplinary from transdisciplinary processes. She presents several types of task interdependencies (pooled, sequential, reciprocal, intensive) with examples from ASLAN projects, notably the Bod game for soft skills evaluation, which required intense collaboration between computer scientists and linguists. Lund also discusses reasons for engaging in ITD research (e.g., higher innovation, broader understanding) and challenges in evaluating such work, including scaling (micro, meso, macro) and institutional contexts. The talk concludes with a call to clarify evaluation criteria and standards for ITD, and she introduces the afternoon’s presentations.

197 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The talk provides valuable insights into the practical and conceptual challenges of interdisciplinary research. Lund’s argumentation is solid, built on established frameworks (e.g., Science of Team Science, Julie Thompson Klein, Piaget) and concrete examples from ASLAN projects. She effectively distinguishes between teamwork and taskwork, and between interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity, clarifying concepts often conflated. The use of real case studies (Géode, Bod) strengthens her points. However, the presentation is largely descriptive and does not critically evaluate the limitations of these frameworks. The argument would be stronger with a more explicit synthesis of how integration can be measured or facilitated. Overall, the value is high for researchers interested in ITD practices, but it remains largely an expert perspective rather than a systematic review.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The talk demonstrates high scientific rigor: Lund references specific researchers and publications (Klein, Christian Paul, Czarniawska, etc.) and draws on relevant literature from psychology, sociology, and team science. She also mentions the Integrate Expert article and the Science of Team Science community. The only direct source provided in the description is a link to the event page, which offers further context. The title accurately matches the content, as the talk revolves around the meaning and application of integration in ASLAN projects. No major discrepancy is evident between the title and the delivered material.

229 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on the concept of integration in the ASLAN large projects, with theoretical and practical examples.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

Presentation by CNRS researcher and director of LabEx ASLAN, grounded in established literature and personal research. The content is scholarly and references well-known frameworks, but is a non-peer-reviewed talk.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The talk offers a nuanced perspective on the concept of integration in interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research, with concrete examples from the ASLAN large projects. It highlights the importance of epistemological, cognitive, and social factors in team collaboration, and proposes a taxonomy of task interdependencies that aids in analyzing team dynamics. The speaker also synthesizes existing literature on ITD evaluation and raises critical questions about assessment criteria and scaling.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Interdisciplinarity — Provides a general overview of the field and its definitions.
  • Transdisciplinarity — Details the concept and its differences from interdisciplinarity.
  • Team science — Discusses the study of teamwork in research, relevant to the Science of Team Science community.
  • Convergence research (no URL) — A related concept from the NSF that emphasizes deep integration across disciplines, as mentioned in the talk.

135 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile of scores shows a balanced performance, with quality of information and reliability slightly higher than quantity and technical level. This suggests a focused, well-grounded presentation that may not cover a broad range of topics but provides depth in its specific area.

Reliability 8/10